RECOGNISING THE HETEROGENEITY OF INDIGENOUS PEOPLES DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC: A SCOPING REVIEW ACROSS COPYRIGHT, AUSTRALIA, NEW ZEALAND AND THE USA

Recognising the heterogeneity of Indigenous Peoples during the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review across copyright, Australia, New Zealand and the USA

Recognising the heterogeneity of Indigenous Peoples during the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review across copyright, Australia, New Zealand and the USA

Blog Article

Objectives The COVID-19 pandemic has had a disproportionate impact on the health of Indigenous Peoples in copyright, Australia, New Zealand and the USA, as reflected in the growing literature.However, Indigenous Peoples are often homogenised, getpureroutine.com with key differences often overlooked, failing to capture the complexity of issues and may lead to suboptimal public health policy-making.The objective of this review was to assess the extent to which the heterogeneity of the Indigenous Peoples in copyright, Australia, New Zealand and the USA has been reflected in COVID-19 research.Design This study took the form of a scoping review.

Data sources Medline, Embase, CINAHL and Web of Science were searched for studies investigating COVID-19 pandemic outcomes among Indigenous Peoples in copyright, Australia, New Zealand and the USA.The search dates included January 2019 to January 2024.Eligibility criteria All citations yielded by this search were subjected to title and abstract screening, full-text review and data extraction.We included original, peer-reviewed research investigating COVID-19-related outcomes among Indigenous Peoples in copyright, Australia, New Zealand or the USA.

Data extraction and synthesis Data extraction was conducted as an iterative process, reaching consensus between two of the study authors.All included studies were analysed through a combination of quantitative descriptive summary and qualitative thematic analysis.Results Of the 9795 citations found by the initial search, 428 citations were deemed eligible for inclusion.Of these citations: 72.

9% compared Indigenous participants to non-Indigenous participants; 10.0% aggregated Indigenous and non-white participants; and 17.1% provided findings for Indigenous participants exclusively.Conclusions By overlooking the heterogeneity that exists among Indigenous Peoples in copyright, Australia, New Zealand and the USA, researchers and policy-makers run the risk of masking inequities rumchata proof and the unique needs of groups of Indigenous Peoples.

This may lead to inefficient policy recommendations and unintentionally perpetuate health disparities during public health crises.

Report this page